<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for damien stolarz blog</title>
	<link>http://www.damienstolarz.com</link>
	<description>the weblog of Damien Stolarz</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on DVD Jukebox wins this round - Kaleidescape vs. DVD Copy Control Association by Tynan on Tech &#187; Memo from Demo: Six startups worth watching</title>
		<link>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2007/04/17/dvd-jukebox-wins-this-round-kaleidescape-vs-dvd-copy-control-association/#comment-1192</link>
		<author>Tynan on Tech &#187; Memo from Demo: Six startups worth watching</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2007/04/17/dvd-jukebox-wins-this-round-kaleidescape-vs-dvd-copy-control-association/#comment-1192</guid>
		<description>[...] it to makers of DVD players and playback software. Real is banking that the courts will uphold the decision in DVD Copy Control Association v Kaleidescape, where the maker of insanely expensive home theater gear successfully defended its right to copy DVD [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] it to makers of DVD players and playback software. Real is banking that the courts will uphold the decision in DVD Copy Control Association v Kaleidescape, where the maker of insanely expensive home theater gear successfully defended its right to copy DVD [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on stereoscopic (&#8221;3D&#8221;) television by dps</title>
		<link>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2008/07/10/stereoscopic-3d-television/#comment-1190</link>
		<author>dps</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2008/07/10/stereoscopic-3d-television/#comment-1190</guid>
		<description>I am hunting down the source of the quote. It was mentioned in a marketing meeting recently and I am calling the person who said it this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am hunting down the source of the quote. It was mentioned in a marketing meeting recently and I am calling the person who said it this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on stereoscopic (&#8221;3D&#8221;) television by Sean Gleeson</title>
		<link>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2008/07/10/stereoscopic-3d-television/#comment-1189</link>
		<author>Sean Gleeson</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2008/07/10/stereoscopic-3d-television/#comment-1189</guid>
		<description>That was a good summation, thanks. Where did you get the one-new-3D-movie-per-month prediction? That is an encouraging statistic, if true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a good summation, thanks. Where did you get the one-new-3D-movie-per-month prediction? That is an encouraging statistic, if true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on US Plans Tactical Nuclear Strikes and tries to make it seem like a rational idea by &#187; Hack 1.04: Browse the Web Well</title>
		<link>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2007/06/28/us-plans-tactical-nuclear-strikes-and-tries-to-make-it-seem-like-a-rational-idea/#comment-1188</link>
		<author>&#187; Hack 1.04: Browse the Web Well</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2007/06/28/us-plans-tactical-nuclear-strikes-and-tries-to-make-it-seem-like-a-rational-idea/#comment-1188</guid>
		<description>[...] &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;http://www.damienstolarz.com/2007/06/28/us-plans-tactical-nuclear-strikes-and-tries-to-make-it-seem-... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;http://www.damienstolarz.com/2007/06/28/us-plans-tactical-nuclear-strikes-and-tries-to-make-it-seem-&#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on develop apps for the iPhone NOW NOW NOW by B. Liu</title>
		<link>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2008/03/18/develop-apps-for-the-iphone-now-now-now/#comment-1187</link>
		<author>B. Liu</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 14:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2008/03/18/develop-apps-for-the-iphone-now-now-now/#comment-1187</guid>
		<description>Just one question: Is it legal to develop commercial software (e.g. Shareware) using the Toolchain? - The Toolchain does require headers from the original Apple Mac SDK and libs from the iPhone file system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just one question: Is it legal to develop commercial software (e.g. Shareware) using the Toolchain? - The Toolchain does require headers from the original Apple Mac SDK and libs from the iPhone file system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Utility to make USB flash drives bootable by Kamal Abbas</title>
		<link>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2004/10/11/utility-to-make-usb-flash-drives-bootable/#comment-1186</link>
		<author>Kamal Abbas</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 11:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2004/10/11/utility-to-make-usb-flash-drives-bootable/#comment-1186</guid>
		<description>very informative issue solved. thanks to all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very informative issue solved. thanks to all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on building the iphone toolchain on leopard by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2008/02/23/building-the-iphone-toolchain-on-leopard/#comment-1185</link>
		<author>Kevin</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2008/02/23/building-the-iphone-toolchain-on-leopard/#comment-1185</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for trying out my script.

I tried to make it as easy as possible to install the Leopard toolchain. Getting it down to one line wasn't easy =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for trying out my script.</p>
<p>I tried to make it as easy as possible to install the Leopard toolchain. Getting it down to one line wasn&#8217;t easy =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on the democrats lose by Not Exactly</title>
		<link>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2008/03/07/the-democrats-lose/#comment-1184</link>
		<author>Not Exactly</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2008/03/07/the-democrats-lose/#comment-1184</guid>
		<description>Not exactly...

A. Voter Turnout - Dem voter turn out was at least double the Republicans in the primary elections. In some states, it was even higher.

B. Republican Fragmentation - I voted in the Republican primary bc I cared who won. Between the candidates still standing, I don't care who wins. My dissent won't be quelled. A lot of the Republican base hates McCain. Republican turnout may well be even lower in November.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not exactly&#8230;</p>
<p>A. Voter Turnout - Dem voter turn out was at least double the Republicans in the primary elections. In some states, it was even higher.</p>
<p>B. Republican Fragmentation - I voted in the Republican primary bc I cared who won. Between the candidates still standing, I don&#8217;t care who wins. My dissent won&#8217;t be quelled. A lot of the Republican base hates McCain. Republican turnout may well be even lower in November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Presidential Race thoughts by dps</title>
		<link>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2008/02/23/presidential-race-thoughts/#comment-1183</link>
		<author>dps</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2008/02/23/presidential-race-thoughts/#comment-1183</guid>
		<description>yes, you make a great point about the cabinet. I think McCain is far more prone to cronyism than obama in terms of cabinet appointment. I believe that all the current leading candidates have enough leadership skill to work with their cabinet and would not simply rely on their cabinet. Plus, the purportedly less experienced of them would certainly stack the deck in their favor with a competent cabinet if they had any sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, you make a great point about the cabinet. I think McCain is far more prone to cronyism than obama in terms of cabinet appointment. I believe that all the current leading candidates have enough leadership skill to work with their cabinet and would not simply rely on their cabinet. Plus, the purportedly less experienced of them would certainly stack the deck in their favor with a competent cabinet if they had any sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Presidential Race thoughts by Danno</title>
		<link>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2008/02/23/presidential-race-thoughts/#comment-1182</link>
		<author>Danno</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 17:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.damienstolarz.com/2008/02/23/presidential-race-thoughts/#comment-1182</guid>
		<description>You're last sentence is the exact frame of mind Bush voters had in 2000.  They claimed that even though Bush doesn't know much about policies, as shown in one of his interviews when he couldn't name leaders of foreign countries, that he will have a "strong cabinet" to make sure things run smoothly.  Well that was an utter disaster. What Bush voters failed to think about was that right off the bat, Bush would have to decide on a cabinet and heads of agencies.  It just so happened it was his cronies, donors, and golfing buddies, and they sure made a mess of things.   IMO, don't vote for someone who would have to rely on his cabinet to get things done, but someone who would work with his cabinet to get things done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re last sentence is the exact frame of mind Bush voters had in 2000.  They claimed that even though Bush doesn&#8217;t know much about policies, as shown in one of his interviews when he couldn&#8217;t name leaders of foreign countries, that he will have a &#8220;strong cabinet&#8221; to make sure things run smoothly.  Well that was an utter disaster. What Bush voters failed to think about was that right off the bat, Bush would have to decide on a cabinet and heads of agencies.  It just so happened it was his cronies, donors, and golfing buddies, and they sure made a mess of things.   IMO, don&#8217;t vote for someone who would have to rely on his cabinet to get things done, but someone who would work with his cabinet to get things done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
